Tag Archives: Readings

10/28/19

October 28, 4:00 – 5:30 // Online Learning, Hybrid Pedagogy, Digital Literacy

•Maha Bali, “Knowing the Difference Between Digital Skills and Digital Literacies, and Teaching Both”

“Digital skills focus on what and how. Digital literacy focuses on why, when, who, and for whom.”

Empower students with digital literacy.

See W. Ian O’Byrne:

“To make digital literacies easier to understand, let’s examine Doug Belshaw’s doctoral thesis. He identifies eight essential elements of digital literacy that lead to positive action:

  1. Cultural: Requires technology use in different contexts and awareness of the values and practices specific to varying contexts
  2. Cognitive: Enables mastery of the use of technological tools, software, and platforms
  3. Constructive: Requires reusing and remixing existing resources depending on need, or possibly adapting them into new resources
  4. Communicative: Requires awareness of different communication devices that are both digital and mobile
  5. Confidence: Places emphasis on gaining competence with digital technologies and the ability to create an environment for practicing skills and self-learning
  6. Creative: Creates new data in digital environments while taking risks, developing skills, and producing new things
  7. Critical: Requires the digital learner to develop various perspectives while actively taking different circumstances into account
  8. Civic: Develops and helps acquire the concepts of democracy and global citizenship as individuals become participants in society”

FoMO: Fear of Missing Out

•Sean Michael Morris, “Online Learning Shouldn’t be ‘Less Than’”

•Jesse Stommel, “What is Hybrid Pedagogy?”

•Chris Friend, “On Vocabulary: ‘Blended Learning’ vs. ‘Hybrid Pedagogy’”

•(Optional): Ethical Online Learning: a Town Hall

How to do nothing, Jenny Odell

i

Projects and ideas

How to effectively teach a fully online course: discussion, social dynamic, connection

Learning/using students’ names

“I’m not a number”

Tools for leading discussion online

Synchronous vs asynchronous

Why/when/how do we decide to teach online?

Understanding both content and format

Rubrics, measurement

Self-generated, autodidacticism

Does this cross across disciplines?

Introversion / access

What’s best for the student?

Student engagement

Why is/is not online teaching for me?

Persona — Performance

Social media

Where in digital space does learning happen?

Private vs. Public online — ethics, data, privacy, safety, legal/copyright

Collaboration

Jason B. Ohler, Digital Community, Digital Citizen

T. V. Reed, Digitized Lives…


Digital Knowledge Cohort, 9/30/19

September 30, 4:00 – 5:30

12-2:30 prior to future readings available for open lab.

Digital Knowledge Cohort

Not what technology I need to use or how to use it, but how does this technology allow me to tell this story…..

Teaching with technology changes teaching. How does technology change the way we teach…..[discipline]…..

“concatenate”

• Ray Bradbury, “There Will Come Soft Rains”

• Audrey Watters, “The Web We Need to Give Students”

What is our responsibility?

• David Weinberger, Small Pieces Loosely Joined (preface and chapter one)

“What is the Web for?”

“The Web, on the other hand, breaks the traditional publishing model. The old model is about control: a team works on a document, is responsible for its content and format, and releases it to the public when it’s been certified as done. Once it’s published, no one can change it except the original publisher. The Web ditches that model, with all its advantages as well as its drawbacks, and says instead, ‘You have something to say? Say it. You want to respond to something that’s been said? Say it and link to it. You think something is interesting? Link to it from your home page. And you never have to ask anyone’s permission.’ Then it adds: ‘And how long will it take to do this? I dunno. How fast do you type?’ By removing the central control points, the Web enabled a self-organizing, self-stimulated growth of contents and links on a scale the world has literally never before experienced.

The result is a loose federation of documents — many small pieces loosely joined.”

OER Stewardship

The CARE Framework:

Toward a Sustainable OER Ecosystem: The Case for OER Stewardship

Posted on March 4, 2018 by lpetrides

By Lisa Petrides, Douglas Levin, and C. Edward Watson

The following is from the above link, with my comments in italics:

  1. Contribute: OER stewards actively contribute to efforts, whether financially or via in-kind contributions, to advance the awareness, improvement, and distribution of OER; how do we define “steward”? what are examples of “efforts”? and
  2. Attribute: OER stewards practice conspicuous attribution, ensuring that all who create or remix OER are properly and clearly credited for their contributions; what do we do when we see something that is not attributed? and
  3. Release: OER stewards ensure OER can be released and used beyond the course and platform in which it was created or delivered; this is absolutely needed; how many times have I been puzzled or struggled with trying to work on a different device/platform? and
  4. Empower: OER stewards are inclusive and strive to meet the diverse needs of all learners, including by supporting the participation of new and non-traditional voices in OER creation and adoption. This requires reaching out to colleagues as well as students who are less comfortable with OER, and perhaps suspicious of it.

11/15/17

“…Nick Couldry, a British media scholar, who argues in his book Why Voice Matters that we are experiencing a contemporary crisis of voice—across political, economic, social domains.  At root, he argues, is a pervasive doctrine of neoliberalism that denies voice matters.”

Documentary studies — close reading, “close enough to hurt”

“Get proximate” to the social justice issues that need our attention

  • Audrey Watters, “The Web We Need to Give Students” (this is one of my favorite pieces about Domain of One’s Own — many of you may have already read it, but I figured I’d add it to the list in case)

Social Justice and education

What do our students’ domains look like after they leave the course in which it was created?

How do faculty use these in “later” classes?

Archive of our own

Digital minimalism

10/4/17

§ Readings for today:

¶ President Paino’s Vision statement for UMW

“Investment of Hope” — 4 goals, each with action steps:

1 Service and social justice

2. Reconstitute the liberal arts for the digital age

3. “Immerse students in impactful learning experienes”

4. Diverse and conclusive community for success

What does a public institution look like with digital liberal arts?

¶ Bryan William Van Norden, “What’s with Nazis and Knights?” Huff Post, 9/19/17

¶ Nathan Heller, “What’s Roiling the Liberal Arts?” The Big Uneasy, The New Yorker, May 30, 2016

¶ Dorothy Kim, “Teaching Medieval Studies in a Time of White Supremacy,” In the Middle, August 28, 2017

¶ Dorothy Kim, “Race, Gender, Academia, and the Tactics of Digital Online Harassment,” SCS Newsletter (Sept. 2017), Medieval Studies and Harassment: https://classicalstudies.org/about/scs-newsletter-september-2017-medieval-studies-and-harassment

“This lack of a website has been a regular talking point for institutions and colleagues who have invited me out for lectures or workshops. It’s an inconvenience but one I plan to continue doing because of the mass of harassment I expect to get when Digital Whiteness and Medieval Studies (forthcoming, ArcPress/WMU) comes out as it discusses online white supremacy (white supremacists/white nationalists/KKK/MRA etc.).”

§ See also:

¶ DK mentioned: Being Black at Michigan

¶ Establish a Social Media Policy, SCS

¶ Rebecca Mead, “The Troll Slayer, A Cambridge classicist takes on her sexist detractors,” The New Yorker, Sept. 1, 2014.

¶ Mary Beard, “Women in Power”

¶ Sarah E. Bond, “Why we need to start seeing the Classical world in color,” Hyperallergic, June 7, 2017.

“Most museums and art history textbooks contain a predominantly neon white display of skin tone when it comes to classical statues and sarcophagi. This has an impact on the way we view the antique world. The assemblage of neon whiteness serves to create a false idea of homogeneity — everyone was very white! — across the Mediterranean region. The Romans, in fact, did not define people as “white”; where, then, did this notion of race come from?”

¶ Colleen Flaherty, “Threats for what she didn’t say,” Inside Higher Ed, June 19, 2017.

§ Pedagogical take-aways:

¶ Be patient, be diligent, teach awareness, have their back, support

9/20/17

More on canva.com:

Teaching materials

 

Other tools:

data.chronicle.com — for displaying date…and possibly adding data.

storymap — part of knight lab

storyline

Geosheets.com

Mapping Gothic France

 

For next week:

Troy’s Vision Statement

Mission of the Liberal Arts and Public Institutions: Roads Taken, Kid for Life

Changing nature of public and private

Changing role of public scholars

Moya, “The Ethics of Public Scholarship”

 

For the future:

Where is the internet?

Physicality of data?

Embodiment/Disembodiment

 

For today:

Digital Knowledge Faculty Initiative

The Work of Being Watched, Mark Andrejevic

“Recent developments in television technology can perhaps provide a more concrete example of how the work of being watched is deployed to rationalize the work of watching.” p. 239

Elahi Hasan

Tracking Transience — cannot copy link

Baltimore Sun

TED Talk — cannot copy link

The Circle (excerpt attached from Martha)

 

 

Readings for 8/30/17

First meeting of Digital Knowledge, Domain of One’s Own, DTLT:

Is digital changing everything, or is knowledge changing the digital?

Art history reading on digital art history?

Domain Fellows, started by Martha Burtis – take DoOO out of the classroom and into their lives.

Ray Bradbury, “There Will Come Soft Rains.” http://schoolsites.schoolworld.com/schools/Cheltenham/webpages/cmanser/files/there%20will%20come%20soft%20rains%20(bradbury)1.pdf

https://youtu.be/LzhlU8rXgHc

https://youtu.be/Lf8-DzofGzI

See also Bradbury’s  The Veldt The World the Children Made, first published in The Saturday Evening Post, September 23, 1950.

Audry Watters, The Web We Need to Give Students.” https://brightreads.com/the-web-we-need-to-give-students-311d97713713

An outsider looking in.

“Giving students their own digital domain is a radical act. It gives them the ability to work on the Web and with the Web.” Why is this radical?

David Weinberger, Small Pieces Loosley Joined (2002). http://www.smallpieces.com/

Werner Herzog, Lo and Behold, documentary.